Legal Opinion

Replogle v. Van Pelt

Supreme Court of Oklahoma

Decided January 7, 1930No. 18693Published

1Opinion of the Court

REID, C.

The plaintiff, Replogle, brought this suit to recover money, alleged in his petition to be due him by the defendant, Van Pelt, under the following contract:

“Know All Men by These Presents; That whereas, on the 16th day of January, 1911, J. D. Van Pelt, joined by his wife, Johnnie Van Pelt, made, executed and delivered to II. L. Graves a certain oil and gas mining lease covering the following described real estate and premises, situated in Okfuskee county, Okla., to wit:
“The N. E. Vt of the S. W.% and the N. % of the S. E. Vi of sec. 9, and the N. W. Vi of the N. AV.J4 of sec. 16,…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. Baker v. L. C. Van Ness & Co.Supreme Court of Oklahoma · 1909
  2. Scott v. Woods Lumber Co.Supreme Court of Oklahoma · 1922
  3. Hastings v. Hugo Nat. BankSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1921
  4. Feenberg v. Tulsa Chamber of CommerceSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1927

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API