Legal Opinion

Feenberg v. Tulsa Chamber of Commerce

Supreme Court of Oklahoma

Decided December 6, 1927No. 17771PublishedCited by 3 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtLester, J.

The parties to this appeal occupy the same position as in, the district court.

On the 9th day of September, 1925, the plaintiff filed an original action in the district court of Tulsa county, being No. 34284. The petition stated and alleged that the plaintiff was entitled to the recovery -of certain general taxes and special levies against a certain lot in the Factory addition to the city of Tulsa. The plaintiff also sought to recover an additional sum of money on account of the delivery of a quantity of earth which was used for the purpose of leveling said lot. The plaintiff alleged that said…

2Cases cited6 opinions

  1. State Ex Rel. Goldsborough v. HustonSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1911
  2. Lunquest v. Ten EyckSupreme Court of Iowa · 1875
  3. Malone v. StretchSupreme Court of Missouri · 1878
  4. Russell v. DefranceSupreme Court of Missouri · 1867
  5. Wolcott v. SmithSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1912

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by3 opinions

  1. State v. OswaldSupreme Court of Kansas · 1966
  2. Replogle v. Van PeltSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1930
  3. State v. OswaldSupreme Court of Kansas · 1966

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API