Legal Opinion

California Cartage Co. v. United States

Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit

Decided October 14, 1986No. 85-7508PublishedCited by 9 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

CHOY, Senior Circuit Judge:

California Cartage Company, Inc., Containerfreight Terminals Company, and Hawaiian Pacific Freight Forwarding (“appellants”) challenge an order issued by the Federal Maritime Commission (“Commission”) denying them standing to challenge an assessment agreement under the Shipping Act, 46 U.S.C. § 801 et seq.

Because the Shipping Act of 1984 eliminated the appellants’ standing to sue, and because manifest injustice would not result from application of the new law, we affirm the Commission’s dismissal of the action.

BACKGROUND

In California Cartage Co. v. United States,…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. Bradley v. School Bd. of RichmondSupreme Court of the United States · 1974
  2. City of Great Falls v. United States Department of LaborCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1982
  3. California Cartage Co. v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1983
  4. Takazato v. Federal Maritime CommissionCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1980

3Cited by9 opinions

  1. Righetti v. Shell Oil Co.District Court, N.D. California · 1989
  2. Coman v. International Playtex, Inc.District Court, N.D. California · 1989
  3. Grimesy v. HuffCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1989
  4. Phillips v. Allstate InsuranceDistrict Court, C.D. California · 1989
  5. Delta Computer Corp. v. Samsung Semiconductor & Telecommunications Co. B.S. Chung Samsung Semiconductor, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1989

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API