Legal Opinion
California Cartage Co. v. United States
Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit
Decided December 12, 1983No. 83-7102PublishedCited by 13 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
SKOPIL, Circuit Judge:
INTRODUCTION
Petitioners California Cartage Company (“Cal Cartage”), Containerfreight Terminals Company (“Containerfreight”), and Hawaiian Pacific Freight Forwarding (“Hawaiian Pacific”) seek review of the Federal Maritime Commission’s (“FMC’s”) order denying them standing to challenge an agreement between the Pacific Maritime Association (“PMA”)1 and the International Longshoremen’s and Warehousemen’s Union (“ILWU”). The FMC held that petitioners were not within the zone of interests protected by section 814 of the Shipping Act, 46 U.S.C. § 801 et seq. as amended by the…
2Cases cited19 opinions
- Valley Forge Christian College v. Americans United for Separation of Church and State, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1982
- Cort v. AshSupreme Court of the United States · 1975
- Association of Data Processing Service Organizations, Inc. v. CampSupreme Court of the United States · 1970
- Tennessee Valley Authority v. HillSupreme Court of the United States · 1978
- Morton v. MancariSupreme Court of the United States · 1974
14 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by13 opinions
- Reid v. EngenCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1985
- Preston v. HecklerCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1984
- Reid v. EngenCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1985
- New York Shipping Ass'n v. Federal Maritime CommissionCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 1988
- Chemehuevi Indian Tribe v. California State Board of EqualizationCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1985
8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.