Grimesy v. Huff
Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit
1Opinion of the Court
SNEED, Circuit Judge:
Plaintiffs sued various California state officials and agencies (California), successfully challenging the validity of state and federal regulations that reduced or eliminated Aid to Families with Dependent Children (AFDC) benefits to eighteen year-old mothers living at home with their parents and not attending school. See Calif.Welf. & Inst.Code § 11008.14 (West Supp.1989); 45 C.F.R. § 233.20(a)(3)(xviii) (1987). California filed a third-party complaint against the Department of Health and Human Services (HHS). As part of the district court’s final judgment, California…
2Cases cited29 opinions
- Logan v. Zimmerman Brush Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1982
- Bradley v. School Bd. of RichmondSupreme Court of the United States · 1974
- United States v. Winston Bryant McConneyCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1984
- Garcia v. San Antonio Metropolitan Transit AuthoritySupreme Court of the United States · 1985
- Bowen v. MassachusettsSupreme Court of the United States · 1988
24 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by28 opinions
- Dean Beaver v. Tarsadia HotelsCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2016
- Gray v. First Winthrop Corp.Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1993
- Lyon v. Agusta, S.P.A.Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2001
- Helen Armstrong v. Terry ReynoldsCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2022
- Jung v. Association of American Medical CollegesDistrict Court, District of Columbia · 2004
23 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.