Legal Opinion

Nelson v. Yonge

California Court of Appeal

Decided July 23, 1925No. Docket No. 4015PublishedCited by 6 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtFinlayson, P. J.

This is an action to recover possession of an automobile, or its value in ease a delivery cannot be had, together with damages for its unlawful detention. Defendant claimed to have a lien upon the car, dependent upon his possession, and for that reason he asserted a right to retain it. The case was tried before a jury, which rendered a verdict in favor of plaintiff for the possession of the property, assessed his damages for the unlawful detention at $500, and found the value of the automobile, in case a delivery thereof to him could not be had, to be $1,000. From a judgment entered upon this…

2Cases cited12 opinions

  1. Allen v. . FoxNew York Court of Appeals · 1873
  2. Pearsall v. HenryCalifornia Supreme Court · 1908
  3. Page v. FowlerCalifornia Supreme Court · 1870
  4. Chapman v. KerrSupreme Court of Missouri · 1883
  5. Tully v. HarloeCalifornia Supreme Court · 1868

7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by6 opinions

  1. Drinkhouse v. Van NessCalifornia Supreme Court · 1927
  2. Booth v. Peoples Finance & Thrift Co.California Court of Appeal · 1932
  3. Elmore Jameson Co. v. SmithCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1939
  4. Jones v. BodkinSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1935
  5. Markall v. PetersonCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1943

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API