Legal Opinion

Chapman v. Kerr

Supreme Court of Missouri

Decided October 15, 1883PublishedCited by 28 opinions

Appeal from, Jackson Special Law and Equity Court. — Hon. R. E. Cowan, Judge.

1Opinion of the CourtHenry, J.

This is an action of replevin, instituted in tbe law and equity court of Jackson county by plaintiffs against defendants, to recover personal property, consisting *159of lamp chimneys, lamps, globes, etc. Plaintiffs were wholesale queensware merchants at Chicago, in November, 1878, and Kerr & Clark then commenced business in Kansas City as retailers of queensware, and also did an auction business. This firm continued under the name of Clark & Kerr until March, 1879, when Clark went out of the firm, and Kerr continued the business until July 27th, 1879, when he made an assignment to ~Watts for the…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. Pope v. JenkinsSupreme Court of Missouri · 1860
  2. Woodburn v. CogdalSupreme Court of Missouri · 1866
  3. Miller v. WhitsonSupreme Court of Missouri · 1867

3Cited by28 opinions

  1. Benjamin v. Metropolitan Street Railway Co.Supreme Court of Missouri · 1896
  2. Kreibohm v. YanceySupreme Court of Missouri · 1900
  3. Mix v. KepnerSupreme Court of Missouri · 1883
  4. W. W. Kendall Boot & Shoe Co. v. BainMissouri Court of Appeals · 1891
  5. Anchor Milling Co. v. WalshMissouri Court of Appeals · 1885

23 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API