Griggs-Paxton Shoe Co. v. Friedheim
Supreme Court of South Carolina
1Opinion of the Court
The opinion of the Court was delivered by
Mr. Acting Associate Justice Purdy.
In March, 1920, the plaintiff sold the defendant a bill of shoes to be shipped in the fail, and, from the testimony, that means a September shipment, and they were to have been paid for at the end of 30 days, with the privilege of a small stated discount off for cash. The shoes declined in price, and the plaintiff voluntarily entered two credits on the account, amounting in the aggregate to $120.
The shoes were in 12 cases, bound around with wire. All of the shipments were made in September of that year, and 90 per…
2Cases cited10 opinions
- McCamant v. BatsellTexas Supreme Court · 1883
- Hargroves v. CookeSupreme Court of Georgia · 1854
- Powers v. RawlsSupreme Court of South Carolina · 1922
- Southern Coal Co. v. RiceSupreme Court of South Carolina · 1923
- Battle v. ReidSupreme Court of Alabama · 1880
5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by10 opinions
- American Insurance Co. v. Midwest Motor Express, Inc.North Dakota Supreme Court · 1996
- Southern Iron & Equipment Co. v. Bamberg, E. & W. Ry. Co.Supreme Court of South Carolina · 1929
- State Ex Rel. State Hospital v. HintzNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 1979
- Bond Bros. Cash & Delivery Grocery, Inc. v. Claussen's Bakeries, Inc.Supreme Court of South Carolina · 1937
- Monroe v. WoodSupreme Court of South Carolina · 1938
5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.