Legal Opinion

Monroe v. Wood

Supreme Court of South Carolina

Decided April 6, 1938No. 14660PublishedCited by 4 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

The opinion of the Court was delivered by

Mr. Justice ■Boni-iam.

December 30, 1929, the plaintiff entered into a written contract with the defendant, I. T. Wood, which provided for the lease by I. T. and S. P. Wood to M. M. Monroe of their two-thirds interest in an ice manufacturing plant in the Town of Tatta, S. C. The plaintiff already owned a one-third interest in the plant. Subsequent to the execution of the contract, I. T. Wood acquired the interest of S. P. Wood in the property leased to Monroe, and assumed all of the obligations of S. P. Wood under the contract.

The contract of lease…

2Cases cited13 opinions

  1. Brooke v. Laurens Milling Co.Supreme Court of South Carolina · 1907
  2. Griffith v. NewellSupreme Court of South Carolina · 1904
  3. Greenwood Cotton Mills v. TolbertSupreme Court of South Carolina · 1916
  4. Southern Coal Co. v. RiceSupreme Court of South Carolina · 1923
  5. Woods v. CramerSupreme Court of South Carolina · 1891

8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by4 opinions

  1. Johnson Cotton Co. v. CannonSupreme Court of South Carolina · 1963
  2. C. W. Anderson Hosiery Co. v. Dixie Knitting Mills, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · 1953
  3. Maryland Attorney General Opinion 100OAG105, Maryland Attorney General Reports2015
  4. McKay v. Anheuser-Busch, Inc.Supreme Court of South Carolina · 1942

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API