Legal Opinion

Southern Iron & Equipment Co. v. Bamberg, E. & W. Ry. Co.

Supreme Court of South Carolina

Decided August 10, 1929No. 12711PublishedCited by 19 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

• The opinion of the Court was delivered by

Mr. Justice BeEasE.

The facts giving rise to this action are, briefly, these:

The respondent, Bamberg, Ehrhardt & Walterboro Railway Company, hereinafter referred to- as the railway company, is an interstate carrier of commerce, and is therefore subject to all the federal laws relating to interstate com- ' merce, including the Safety Appliance and Boiler and Locomotive Inspection Acts of Congress.

The appellant, Southern Iron & Equipment Company, hereinafter referred to as the equipment company, is a corporation, existing under the laws of the state of…

2Cases cited20 opinions

  1. Martin v. Seaboard Air Line Ry.Supreme Court of South Carolina · 1904
  2. Brooke v. Laurens Milling Co.Supreme Court of South Carolina · 1907
  3. Welborn v. CobbSupreme Court of South Carolina · 1912
  4. Greenwood Cotton Mills v. TolbertSupreme Court of South Carolina · 1916
  5. Kauffman Milling Co. v. StuckeySupreme Court of South Carolina · 1892

15 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by19 opinions

  1. Lane v. Trenholm Building CompanySupreme Court of South Carolina · 1976
  2. Halsey v. Minnesota-South Carolina Land & Timber Co.Supreme Court of South Carolina · 1934
  3. Aaron v. Hampton Motors, Inc.Supreme Court of South Carolina · 1962
  4. Bevins v. LivesayCourt of Appeals of Tennessee · 1949
  5. Thompson v. BassSupreme Court of South Carolina · 1932

14 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API