Legal Opinion

Schaefer & Co. v. Industrial Commission

Wisconsin Supreme Court

Decided February 4, 1936PublishedCited by 15 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtRosenberry, C. J.

Max Marsz was a married man, at the time of the hearing fifty-nine years of age. He had been in the employment of Schaefer monument company twenty-six years. He noticed that there was something wrong with his chest before he left his employment. A different insurance carrier going upon the risk required that the men employed be examined. As a result of such examination by Dr. Sander, it was discovered that the claimant had silicosis, and he was discharged oh February 5, 1934. Upon the hearing, four physicians testified as to the physical condition of the applicant. The commission did not make…

2Cases cited7 opinions

  1. Zurich General Accident & Liability Insurance v. Industrial CommissionWisconsin Supreme Court · 1930
  2. Wisconsin Granite Co. v. Industrial CommissionWisconsin Supreme Court · 1932
  3. Michigan Quartz Silica Co. v. Industrial CommissionWisconsin Supreme Court · 1934
  4. Kannenberg Granite Co. v. Industrial CommissionWisconsin Supreme Court · 1933
  5. Milwaukee Malleable & Grey Iron Works v. Industrial CommissionWisconsin Supreme Court · 1936

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by15 opinions

  1. Green Bay Drop Forge Co. v. Industrial CommissionWisconsin Supreme Court · 1953
  2. Montello Granite Co. v. Industrial CommissionWisconsin Supreme Court · 1938
  3. Kohler Co. v. Department of Industry, Labor & Human RelationsWisconsin Supreme Court · 1969
  4. Pfister & Vogel Tanning Co. v. Department of Industry, Labor & Human RelationsWisconsin Supreme Court · 1979
  5. Virginia Surety Co. v. Wisconsin Labor & Industry Review CommissionCourt of Appeals of Wisconsin · 2002

10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API