Legal Opinion

Peck v. Woomack

Nevada Supreme Court

Decided April 20, 1948No. 3510PublishedCited by 12 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION

By the Court,

Horsey, J.:

In this case the respondent, defendant in the court below, demurred to the amended complaint of the plaintiff (appellant), upon two grounds, namely, that the plaintiff, in his amended complaint, failed to state facts sufficient to constitute a cause of action, and that the allegations of the amended complaint were ambiguous, unintelligible and uncertain. The demurrer was sustained, and upon the plaintiff deciding to stand upon his amended complaint, for the purpose of appeal, and declining to amend further, judgment was entered in favor of defendant and for his…

Also in this document: Concurrence.

2Cases cited11 opinions

  1. Childress v. EmorySupreme Court of the United States · 1823
  2. Floyd v. PattersonTexas Supreme Court · 1888
  3. Doyal v. RussellSupreme Court of Georgia · 1936
  4. Penziner v. West American Finance Co.California Court of Appeal · 1933
  5. Little v. Union Oil Co.California Court of Appeal · 1925

6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by12 opinions

  1. Basil v. WolfSupreme Court of New Jersey · 2007
  2. Puckrein v. ATI Transport, Inc.Supreme Court of New Jersey · 2006
  3. Glover v. BergerWyoming Supreme Court · 1956
  4. McGrath v. DubsMontana Supreme Court · 1953
  5. Labor Commissioner v. Mapes Hotel CorporationNevada Supreme Court · 1973

7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API