United States v. Siegel
District Court, D. Minnesota
1Opinion of the Court
JOHN B. SANBORN, District Judge.
Bennie Siegel was tried and convicted of a violation of the Harrison Anti-Narcotic Act (Comp. St. §■§ 6287g-6287q) in. October, 1926. Tbe evidence of tbe government showed that on the 10th day of April, 1926, he sold to an addict by the name of Lang an ounce of morphine, and received $55; that Lang received the $55 from government officers of the Narcotic Department; that two of them accompanied him to the pool room where the purchase was made; that two others saw Siegel come out of this place and approach a man by the name of Kurtz, from whom he apparently…
2Cases cited8 opinions
- Rosen v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1896
- Grimm v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1895
- Butts v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1921
- Price v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1897
- Goode v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1895
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by9 opinions
- James Whiting v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the First Circuit · 1961
- Carlton v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1952
- Locklayer v. StateIndiana Court of Appeals · 1974
- Swallum v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1930
- Charles Wells Neill v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1955
4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.