Legal Opinion

United States v. Siegel

District Court, D. Minnesota

Decided December 1, 1926PublishedCited by 9 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

JOHN B. SANBORN, District Judge.

Bennie Siegel was tried and convicted of a violation of the Harrison Anti-Narcotic Act (Comp. St. §■§ 6287g-6287q) in. October, 1926. Tbe evidence of tbe government showed that on the 10th day of April, 1926, he sold to an addict by the name of Lang an ounce of morphine, and received $55; that Lang received the $55 from government officers of the Narcotic Department; that two of them accompanied him to the pool room where the purchase was made; that two others saw Siegel come out of this place and approach a man by the name of Kurtz, from whom he apparently…

2Cases cited8 opinions

  1. Rosen v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1896
  2. Grimm v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1895
  3. Butts v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1921
  4. Price v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1897
  5. Goode v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1895

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by9 opinions

  1. James Whiting v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the First Circuit · 1961
  2. Carlton v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1952
  3. Locklayer v. StateIndiana Court of Appeals · 1974
  4. Swallum v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1930
  5. Charles Wells Neill v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1955

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API