Legal Opinion
Swallum v. United States
Court of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit
Decided February 26, 1930No. 8471PublishedCited by 13 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
DEWEY, District Judge.
Plaintiff in error, J. A. Swallum, referred to herein as the defendant, alleged to be a physician duly registered under the act of Congress known as the Harrison AntiNarcotie Law (26 USCA § 211, 691-707), is charged with having unlawfully sold morphine sulphate by prescription on four different occasions to Richie Feinberg; each occasion being covered by a separate count of the indictment. He was tried and convicted. He complains here of having been entrapped by government agents, and assigns as error the refusal of the trial court to sustain his motion at the close of…
2Cases cited8 opinions
- Grimm v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1895
- Butts v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1921
- Price v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1897
- Goode v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1895
- Andrews v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1896
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by13 opinions
- Morei v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 1942
- O'BRIEN v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 1931
- Charles Eugene Hamilton v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1955
- Harry Morris Sherman v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1957
- Heath v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 1948
8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.