Legal Opinion

Rosen v. United States

Supreme Court of the United States

Decided January 27, 1896No. 424PublishedCited by 413 opinions

ERROR TO THE CIRCUIT OP THE UNITED STATES FOR THE SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF NEW YORK. The case is stated in the opinion.

1Opinion of the CourtJustice Harlan

The plaintiff in error was indicted under section 3893 of the Revised Statutes, providing that “ every obscene, lewd, or lascivious book, pamphlet, picture, paper, writing, print, or other publication of an indecent character, . . . and every article or thing intended or adapted for any indecent or immoral use, and every written or printed card, circular, book, pamphlet, advertisement, or notice of any kind giving information-, directly or indirectly, where, or how, or of whom, or by what means, any of the hereinbefore mentioned matters, articles, or things may be obtained or made, . . . are…

2Cases cited6 opinions

  1. Sparf v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1895
  2. Pleasants v. FantSupreme Court of the United States · 1875
  3. Grimm v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1895
  4. Goode v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1895
  5. Marshall v. HubbardSupreme Court of the United States · 1886

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by413 opinions

  1. Roth v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1957
  2. Hamling v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1974
  3. Sorrells v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1932
  4. Russell v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1962
  5. Hagner v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1932

408 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API