Legal Opinion

Koczka v. Hardware Dealers Mutual Fire Insurance

Wisconsin Supreme Court

Decided January 4, 1966PublishedCited by 8 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtGordon, J.

We have concluded that the learned trial court erred when it granted a directed verdict in favor of the plaintiff.

The evidence must be considered in a light most favorable to the party against whom the verdict was directed. Our review of the evidence convinces us that the evidence was not so clear and convincing as to have permitted impartial minds to have come to but one conclusion. The foregoing are the recognized standards to be used in determining whether a directed verdict should be granted. Tanberg v. Rydberg (1965), 26 Wis. (2d) 91, 94, 95, 131 N. W. (2d) 858; Anderson v. Joint School…

2Cases cited9 opinions

  1. Davis v. SkilleWisconsin Supreme Court · 1961
  2. Gilson v. Drees Bros.Wisconsin Supreme Court · 1963
  3. Anderson v. Joint School District No. 3Wisconsin Supreme Court · 1964
  4. Schlueter v. GradyWisconsin Supreme Court · 1963
  5. Wadoz v. United National Indemnity Co.Wisconsin Supreme Court · 1957

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by8 opinions

  1. Pedrick v. Peoria & Eastern RailroadIllinois Supreme Court · 1967
  2. Zillmer v. MiglautschWisconsin Supreme Court · 1967
  3. City of Milwaukee v. BichelWisconsin Supreme Court · 1967
  4. Miskofsky v. Ohio Cas. Ins. Co.New Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · 1984
  5. Barbacci v. IrwinUnited States Bankruptcy Court, N.D. Ohio · 2020

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API