City of Milwaukee v. Bichel
Wisconsin Supreme Court
1Opinion of the CourtHeffernan, J.
A verdict ought to be directed if, taking into consideration all the facts and circumstances as they appear in evidence, there is but one inference or conclusion that can be reached by a reasonable man. 1 Wisconsin Continuing Legal Education 125. In this case the trial judge concluded that the facts before him warranted the directed verdict of “guilty.” He made no analysis of the evidence in a memorandum opinion, so we do not have the benefit of his thinking at the time he made his decision. We, therefore, are obliged to review the evidence ab initio to determine whether the trial court’s…
2Cases cited15 opinions
- Trautmann v. Charles Schefft & Sons Co.Wisconsin Supreme Court · 1930
- Davis v. SkilleWisconsin Supreme Court · 1961
- Rusch v. Sentinel-News Co.Wisconsin Supreme Court · 1933
- Czerniakowski v. National Ice & Coal Co.Wisconsin Supreme Court · 1948
- Smith v. PabstWisconsin Supreme Court · 1939
10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by26 opinions
- Kozlowski v. John E. Smith's Sons Co.Wisconsin Supreme Court · 1979
- State v. BurkmanWisconsin Supreme Court · 1980
- State v. LeachWisconsin Supreme Court · 1985
- Zillmer v. MiglautschWisconsin Supreme Court · 1967
- City of Milwaukee v. Allied Smelting Corp.Court of Appeals of Wisconsin · 1983
21 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.