Legal Opinion
Miskofsky v. Ohio Cas. Ins. Co.
New Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division
Decided October 31, 1984PublishedCited by 11 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
203 N.J. Super. 400 (1984)
497 A.2d 223
MARION MISKOFSKY, PLAINTIFF,
v.
THE OHIO CASUALTY INSURANCE COMPANY, DEFENDANT.
Superior Court of New Jersey, Law Division Gloucester County.
Decided October 31, 1984.
Gary D. Ginsberg, for plaintiff (Nathan Friedman, attorney).
Robert T. Zane, for defendant (Montano, Summers, Mullen, Manuel & Owens, attorneys).
HOLSTON, J.S.C.
This matter was tried before the court without a jury based on the mandate of Thomas P. Manetti v. Prudential Property and Casualty Insurance Company, 196 N.J. Super. 317 (App. Div. 1984). That decision held that there is no right to a…
2Cases cited18 opinions
- Maros v. Transamerica Insurance CompanySupreme Court of New Jersey · 1978
- Brokenbaugh v. NJ Manufacturers Ins. Co.New Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · 1978
- Victum v. MartinMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1975
- Corcoran v. Hartford Fire Ins. Co.New Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · 1975
- Manetti v. Prudential Property & Cas. Ins. Co.New Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · 1984
13 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by11 opinions
- Thermographic Diagnostics, Inc. v. Allstate InsuranceSupreme Court of New Jersey · 1991
- Upthegrove Hardware, Inc. v. Pennsylvania Lumbermans InsuranceCourt of Appeals of Wisconsin · 1989
- IFA Ins. Co. v. WaittNew Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · 1994
- Elkins v. New Jersey Mfrs. Ins. Co.New Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · 1990
- Simon v. CNA Ins. Co.New Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · 1988
6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.