Legal Opinion

Sawh v. City of Lino Lakes

Court of Appeals of Minnesota

Decided July 25, 2011No. A10-2143PublishedCited by 1 opinion

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION

SCHELLHAS, Judge.

Relator challenges the City of Lino Lakes City Council’s order for the destruction of his dog after its declaration as a dangerous animal under the Lino Lakes Code of Ordinances. Because the city’s declaration of the dog as a dangerous animal is predicated on the dog’s earlier declaration as a potentially dangerous animal, which the city’s ordinance provided no *665meaningful opportunity to challenge, the city’s ordinance violates relator’s due-process rights, and we reverse.

FACTS

Relator Mitchell Sawh is a resident of the City of Lino Lakes. He and his family own a…

2Cases cited11 opinions

  1. Mathews v. EldridgeSupreme Court of the United States · 1976
  2. Dietz v. Dodge CountySupreme Court of Minnesota · 1992
  3. Corn v. SheppardSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1930
  4. Neeland v. Clearwater Memorial HospitalSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1977
  5. Staeheli v. City of St. PaulCourt of Appeals of Minnesota · 2007

6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by1 opinion

  1. Sawh v. City of Lino LakesSupreme Court of Minnesota · 2012

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API