Sawh v. City of Lino Lakes
Court of Appeals of Minnesota
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION
SCHELLHAS, Judge.
Relator challenges the City of Lino Lakes City Council’s order for the destruction of his dog after its declaration as a dangerous animal under the Lino Lakes Code of Ordinances. Because the city’s declaration of the dog as a dangerous animal is predicated on the dog’s earlier declaration as a potentially dangerous animal, which the city’s ordinance provided no *665meaningful opportunity to challenge, the city’s ordinance violates relator’s due-process rights, and we reverse.
FACTS
Relator Mitchell Sawh is a resident of the City of Lino Lakes. He and his family own a…
2Cases cited11 opinions
- Mathews v. EldridgeSupreme Court of the United States · 1976
- Dietz v. Dodge CountySupreme Court of Minnesota · 1992
- Corn v. SheppardSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1930
- Neeland v. Clearwater Memorial HospitalSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1977
- Staeheli v. City of St. PaulCourt of Appeals of Minnesota · 2007
6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by1 opinion
- Sawh v. City of Lino LakesSupreme Court of Minnesota · 2012