Legal Opinion

Ray's Case

Supreme Judicial Court of Maine

Decided December 22, 1922PublishedCited by 28 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtDeasy, J.

This is an appeal by the defendants in a workman’s compensation case. The act governing the case and which is herein referred to is Public Law of 1919, Chapter 238.

The petitioner suffered an industrial accident on July 17, 1920, losing three fingers of his left hand. In accordance with Section 16 he received for a period specific compensation for an assumed total disability. He then entered into an agreement with his employer and insurance carrier for compensation for partial incapacity. He now brings his petition under Section 36 for review on the ground that his “incapacity has increased.”

Hi…

2Cases cited6 opinions

  1. Matter of Jordan v. . Decorative Co.New York Court of Appeals · 1921
  2. Gorrell v. BattelleSupreme Court of Kansas · 1914
  3. Sullivan's CaseMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1914
  4. Duprey's CaseMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1914
  5. Durney's CaseMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1916

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by28 opinions

  1. Bureau v. Staffing Network, Inc.Supreme Judicial Court of Maine · 1996
  2. Ibbitson v. Sheridan Corp.Supreme Judicial Court of Maine · 1980
  3. Levesque v. ShoreySupreme Judicial Court of Maine · 1972
  4. Bolduc v. Pioneer Plastics Corp. &/Or American Mutual LiabilitySupreme Judicial Court of Maine · 1973
  5. Bowen v. Maplewood Packing Co.Supreme Judicial Court of Maine · 1976

23 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API