Legal Opinion

Estes v. Hancock County Bank

Indiana Supreme Court

Decided November 30, 1972No. 1172S164PublishedCited by 17 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

On Petition to Transfer

Arterburn, C.J.

This case is before the Court on petition to transfer [Rule AP. 11 (B)] filed by petitioner-co-defendant below, Hancock County Bank (hereinafter referred to as petitioner or bank). The issue raised by the petition is whether a verdict exonerating an agent-employee can sustain judgment in favor of the principal if the principal’s liability is based exclusively upon the conduct of such employee, the sole agent involved in the questioned activities.

The facts giving rise to this petition and the proceedings below may be summarized as follows.…

2Cases cited21 opinions

  1. City of Anderson v. FlemingIndiana Supreme Court · 1903
  2. Childress v. Lake Erie & Western RailroadIndiana Supreme Court · 1914
  3. Indianapolis Traction & Terminal Co. v. HenbyIndiana Supreme Court · 1912
  4. Phar-Crest Land Corp. v. TherberIndiana Supreme Court · 1969
  5. Lytton v. BairdIndiana Supreme Court · 1884

16 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by17 opinions

  1. Southern Management Corp. v. TahaCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 2003
  2. Margarita Rivera De Feliciano, Etc. v. Francisco De Jesus, Etc., Farm Credit CorporationCourt of Appeals for the First Circuit · 1989
  3. Hendrickson & Sons Motor Co. v. OSHAIndiana Court of Appeals · 1975
  4. Crosson v. BerryIndiana Court of Appeals · 2005
  5. HEALTH & HOSPITAL CORP., ETC. v. GaitherIndiana Supreme Court · 1979

12 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API