Legal Opinion

Indianapolis Traction & Terminal Co. v. Henby

Indiana Supreme Court

Decided February 2, 1912No. 21,762PublishedCited by 32 opinions

Prom Morgan Circuit Court; Joseph W. Williams, Judge. Action by Catherine L. Henby against the Indianapolis Traction and Terminal Company. Prom a judgment for plaintiff, defendant appeals.

1Opinion of the CourtMorris, C. J.

Appellee sued appellant for malicious prosecution. There was a trial by jury, resulting in a verdict and judgment against appellant for $10,000. Prom that judgment appellant appeals.

It is, among other things claimed by appellant that the verdict is not sustained by sufficient evidence, because it shows probable cause for the prosecution of the criminal charge, and because appellee is estopped, by her conduct, from claiming damages.

The following facts appear from the record, without substantial controversy: In June, 1904, appellee, a resident of Marion county, sued appellant in the Marion…

2Cases cited31 opinions

  1. Blunt v. LittleU.S. Circuit Court for the District of Massachusetts · 1822
  2. Clason v. . BaldwinNew York Court of Appeals · 1897
  3. Franklin National Bank v. WhiteheadIndiana Supreme Court · 1898
  4. Hosford v. JohnsonIndiana Supreme Court · 1881
  5. Robbins v. MageeIndiana Supreme Court · 1881

26 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by32 opinions

  1. Wong v. TaborIndiana Court of Appeals · 1981
  2. Willsey v. Peoples Federal Savings & Loan Ass'n of East ChicagoIndiana Court of Appeals · 1988
  3. Deckard v. AdamsIndiana Supreme Court · 1965
  4. Southern, School Buildings, Inc. v. Loew Electric, Inc.Indiana Court of Appeals · 1980
  5. FW Woolworth Co., Inc. v. AndersonIndiana Court of Appeals · 1984

27 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API