State v. Bernard
Court of Appeals of Minnesota
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION
ROSS, Judge.
William Bernard was arrested for suspected drunk driving and refused to take a breath test requested by police under the state’s implied consent law. The state charged Bernard with the crime of test refusal. The district court dismissed the charge, reasoning that the Constitution prohibits the state from criminalizing refusal to submit to a search that could not be compelled without a warrant. We reverse because the state may prosecute a suspected drunk driver for test refusal under the implied consent law when the requesting officer had other lawful means to obtain a…
2Cases cited15 opinions
- Illinois v. GatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1983
- Schmerber v. CaliforniaSupreme Court of the United States · 1966
- Skinner v. Railway Labor Executives' Assn.Supreme Court of the United States · 1989
- Arizona v. GantSupreme Court of the United States · 2009
- Missouri v. McNeelySupreme Court of the United States · 2013
10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by7 opinions
- State v. RyceSupreme Court of Kansas · 2016
- State of Minnesota v. William Robert Bernard, Jr.Supreme Court of Minnesota · 2015
- State v. BirchfieldNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 2015
- State v. KordonowyNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 2015
- State of Minnesota v. Tarah Louise FichtnerCourt of Appeals of Minnesota · 2015
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.