State of Minnesota v. Tarah Louise Fichtner
Court of Appeals of Minnesota
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION
RODENBERG, Judge.
Appellant Tarah Louise Fichtner challenges her convictions for driving while impaired, test refusal, and child endangerment, arguing that (1) the test-refusal statute is unconstitutional, (2) her driving-while-impaired offense was improperly enhanced because the three children present in her motor vehicle at the time of the incident were counted as separate aggravating factors, (3) the district court reversibly erred in admitting a recording of a 911 call at trial, and (4) the district court erred in sentencing her on all three charges arising from the same behavioral…
2Cases cited30 opinions
- Davis v. WashingtonSupreme Court of the United States · 2006
- Missouri v. McNeelySupreme Court of the United States · 2013
- State v. JohnsonSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1966
- State v. BrooksSupreme Court of Minnesota · 2013
- State v. MurphySupreme Court of Minnesota · 1996
25 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by1 opinion
- State of Minnesota v. Richard Lee CunninghamCourt of Appeals of Minnesota · 2015