Legal Opinion
Kendall v. Board of Osteopathic Examiners
California Court of Appeal
Decided July 2, 1951No. Civ. 14668PublishedCited by 17 opinions
1Opinion of the CourtBray, J.
Respondent board, after a hearing of certain charges, revoked petitioner’s license as a drugless practitioner. On application to the superior court for a writ of mandate to compel the restoration of the license, the revocation was affirmed and the writ denied. Petitioner appeals.
Questions Involved
1. Are the findings of the trial court and the board supported by the weight of the evidence!
2. Was petitioner denied a fair hearing because of alleged prejudice of a board member!
3. Concerning charges as to which no evidence was offered, was the board required to dismiss with prejudice ?
Recobd
Petitio…
2Cases cited7 opinions
- Moran v. Board of Medical ExaminersCalifornia Supreme Court · 1948
- Webster v. Board of Dental ExaminersCalifornia Supreme Court · 1941
- People v. RamseyCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1948
- Murphy v. Board of Medical ExaminersCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1946
- McPheeters v. Board of Medical ExaminersCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1930
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by17 opinions
- Hughes v. Board of Architectural ExaminersCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1998
- Cornell v. ReillyCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1954
- People v. KendallCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1952
- Rist v. Toole CountyMontana Supreme Court · 1945
- Arenstein v. California State Board of PharmacyCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1968
12 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.