Legal Opinion
Pueblo Radiology Medical Group, Inc. v. Gerlach
California Court of Appeal
Decided June 4, 2008No. B194106PublishedCited by 14 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
Opinion
PERREN, J.
— Appellant Pueblo Radiology Medical Group, Inc. (Pueblo), filed a breach of contract action against Vitascan, Inc. (Vitascan), and respondents J. Dalton Gerlach (Gerlach) and Daniel Parker (Parker). The allegations against Gerlach and Parker were that they were the alter egos of Vitascan. The trial court found they were not and judgment was entered accordingly, including an award of attorney fees to them under Civil Code section 1717. Pueblo asserts the award of fees was premature because there has been no determination of whether a breach of contract occurred. We disagree.…
2Cases cited4 opinions
- Reynolds Metals Co. v. AlpersonCalifornia Supreme Court · 1979
- Dell Merk, Inc. v. FranziaCalifornia Court of Appeal · 2005
- Profit Concepts Management, Inc. v. GriffithCalifornia Court of Appeal · 2008
- First Security Bank of California v. PaquetCalifornia Court of Appeal · 2002
3Cited by14 opinions
- In re Tobacco Cases ICalifornia Court of Appeal · 2011
- PNEC Corp. v. MeyerCalifornia Court of Appeal · 2010
- Burkhalter Kessler Clement & George LLP v. Hamilton, California Court of Appeal, 5th District2018
- CB Richard Ellis, Inc. v. Terra Nostra ConsultantsCalifornia Court of Appeal · 2014
- Retzloff v. Moulton Parkway Residents' Ass'n, California Court of Appeal, 5th District2017
9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.