Legal Opinion
Retzloff v. Moulton Parkway Residents' Ass'n
California Court of Appeal, 5th District
Decided August 23, 2017No. G053164PublishedCited by 3 opinions
1Opinion of the CourtMoore, J.
*745Plaintiffs Amber Retzloff, James Franklin, and Nancy Stewart sued defendant Moulton Parkway Residents' Association, No. One (the association), twice for alleged violations of the Davis-Stirling Common Interest Development Act ( Civ. Code, § 4000 et seq. ; the Act). The first suit was dismissed without prejudice by plaintiffs; the trial court sustained the association's demurrer to the second suit without leave to amend. The court further concluded that plaintiffs' second action was frivolous and awarded the *746association costs and attorney *333fees under Civil Code section 5235 1 , subdivision (c)…
2Cases cited13 opinions
- Panopulos v. MaderisCalifornia Supreme Court · 1956
- Vasquez v. CaliforniaCalifornia Supreme Court · 2008
- Reitano v. YankwichCalifornia Supreme Court · 1951
- Smith v. Selma Community HospitalCalifornia Court of Appeal · 2010
- Selby Constructors v. McCarthyCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1979
8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by3 opinions
- Burch v. CertainTeed Corp.California Court of Appeal · 2019
- LNSU 1, LLC v. Alta Del Mar Coastal Collection Community Assn.California Court of Appeal · 2023
- Reyes v. Beneficial State BankCalifornia Court of Appeal · 2022