Legal Opinion
United States v. Howard Dale Bernard, Gordon Rae Childress, Sammy Brice Brock, Roger Lee Bard, Russell Richard Cochran
Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit
Decided April 28, 1980No. 78-3033PublishedCited by 109 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
JAMESON, District Judge:
The defendants-appellees are charged with conspiracy to manufacture methamphetamine, a controlled substance, in violation of 21 U.S.C. §§ 812, 841(a)(1) and 846, and with two substantive counts relating to the manufacture and possession of methamphetamine, in violation of 21 U.S.C. §§ 812 and 841(a)(1) and 18 U.S.C. § 2. The Government, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. § 3731, has appealed from an order of the district court granting defendants’ motions to suppress evidence seized at the time of their arrests.
Factual Background
In October, 1977, Michael Brown, who was under arrest…
2Cases cited38 opinions
- Brady v. MarylandSupreme Court of the United States · 1963
- Brinegar v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1949
- Beck v. OhioSupreme Court of the United States · 1964
- United States v. WatsonSupreme Court of the United States · 1975
- Whiteley v. Warden, Wyoming State PenitentiarySupreme Court of the United States · 1971
33 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by109 opinions
- United States v. Juan Castillo, Aka: Luis Hong Rojas, United States of America v. Antonio De La RentaCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1989
- Motley v. ParksCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2005
- United States v. Anthony Ruiz Del VizoCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1990
- Ramirez v. City of Buena ParkCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2009
- United States of America, Plaintiff-Appellant-Cross-Appellee v. Pierre Fouche, Defendant-Appellee-Cross-AppellantCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1985
104 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.