United States of America, Plaintiff-Appellant-Cross-Appellee v. Pierre Fouche, Defendant-Appellee-Cross-Appellant
Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit
1Opinion of the Court
TANG, Circuit Judge.
Pierre Fouche appeals his conviction on two counts of unarmed bank robbery, in violation of 18 U.S.C. § 2113(a). He argues that the district court erred in finding that: (1) founded suspicion existed to stop his car; (2) probable cause existed for his arrest; and (3) he failed to reclaim his right to counsel before his first confession. The government cross-appeals, arguing that the district court erred in finding Fouche’s second confession involuntary as a product of unreasonable pre-arraignment delay.
We affirm the district court’s findings that the police had founded…
2Cases cited33 opinions
- Miranda v. ArizonaSupreme Court of the United States · 1966
- Terry v. OhioSupreme Court of the United States · 1968
- Edwards v. ArizonaSupreme Court of the United States · 1981
- United States v. CortezSupreme Court of the United States · 1981
- Delaware v. ProuseSupreme Court of the United States · 1979
28 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by141 opinions
- State v. StephensonTennessee Supreme Court · 1994
- Holland v. StateMississippi Supreme Court · 1991
- United States v. Alvarez-SanchezSupreme Court of the United States · 1994
- Berry v. StateMississippi Supreme Court · 1990
- People v. ClarkCalifornia Supreme Court · 1993
136 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.