Legal Opinion

United States of America, Plaintiff-Appellant-Cross-Appellee v. Pierre Fouche, Defendant-Appellee-Cross-Appellant

Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit

Decided November 19, 1985No. 84-5262, 84-5283PublishedCited by 141 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

TANG, Circuit Judge.

Pierre Fouche appeals his conviction on two counts of unarmed bank robbery, in violation of 18 U.S.C. § 2113(a). He argues that the district court erred in finding that: (1) founded suspicion existed to stop his car; (2) probable cause existed for his arrest; and (3) he failed to reclaim his right to counsel before his first confession. The government cross-appeals, arguing that the district court erred in finding Fouche’s second confession involuntary as a product of unreasonable pre-arraignment delay.

We affirm the district court’s findings that the police had founded…

2Cases cited33 opinions

  1. Miranda v. ArizonaSupreme Court of the United States · 1966
  2. Terry v. OhioSupreme Court of the United States · 1968
  3. Edwards v. ArizonaSupreme Court of the United States · 1981
  4. United States v. CortezSupreme Court of the United States · 1981
  5. Delaware v. ProuseSupreme Court of the United States · 1979

28 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by141 opinions

  1. State v. StephensonTennessee Supreme Court · 1994
  2. Holland v. StateMississippi Supreme Court · 1991
  3. United States v. Alvarez-SanchezSupreme Court of the United States · 1994
  4. Berry v. StateMississippi Supreme Court · 1990
  5. People v. ClarkCalifornia Supreme Court · 1993

136 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API