Legal Opinion

State ex rel. Lehman v. Bridges

Washington Supreme Court

Decided March 30, 1901No. 3196PublishedCited by 3 opinions

Original Application for Mandamus.

1Per curiam

This is an original application made to this court hy the relator, whereby he seeks a peremptory writ of mandate against'the respondent, commanding him to receive and file the relator’s application to .purchase certain tide lands in the county of King, state of Wash*364ington,, and to issue a contract of sale for such lands as second-class tide lands.

It appears from the record that the application to purchase was duly made to the respondent as required by law, and accompanying the application was a tender of the amount necessary to be paid before the issuance of a contract for the sale of…

2Cited by3 opinions

  1. Groeneveld v. Camano Blue Point Oyster Co.Washington Supreme Court · 1938
  2. State v. ScottWashington Supreme Court · 1916
  3. Lehman v. HeustonWashington Supreme Court · 1913

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API