Legal Opinion

Barbara Parmenter Living Trust v. Lemon

Court of Appeals of Oregon

Decided May 16, 2007No. 120223704; A126429PublishedCited by 2 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

*671ROSENBLUM, J.

Defendants appeal a supplemental judgment in this action under the Residential Landlord and Tenant Act (RLTA). They assign error (1) to the trial court’s designation of both parties as prevailing parties and the award of a prevailing party fee to plaintiff, and (2) to the denial of their request for attorney fees and costs. We conclude that defendants’ first assignment of error is not properly before us, and we affirm the denial of defendants’ petition for attorney fees.

Defendants rented a duplex from plaintiff. After they vacated the duplex, plaintiff filed an action for breach…

2Cases cited7 opinions

  1. Marquam Investment Corp. v. MyersCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 1978
  2. Executive Management Corporation v. JuckettOregon Supreme Court · 1976
  3. Preble v. Department of RevenueOregon Supreme Court · 2001
  4. Amatisto v. PazCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 1986
  5. Stocker v. KeithCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 2002

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by2 opinions

  1. Barbara Parmenter Living Trust v. LemonOregon Supreme Court · 2008
  2. Barbara Parmenter Living Trust v. LemonCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 2007

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API