Legal Opinion
Aronson v. Ambrose
District Court, Virgin Islands
Decided April 17, 1972No. Civ. No. 326/1971PublishedCited by 5 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
CHRISTIAN; Chief Judge
OPINION
Plaintiffs are before this court challenging the refusal of the Committee of Bar Examiners to recommend their admission to the practice of law in this jurisdiction. By letter of June 9, 1971, the plaintiffs were informed that on the face of their applications, they did not meet the requirements for admission. Three reasons were assigned:
1. they had not passed the Virgin Islands Bar Examination as required by Rule 56(d) of the Rules of the District Court;
2. they had not alleged that they would have resided in the Virgin Islands for at least one year immediately…
2Cases cited17 opinions
- Shapiro v. ThompsonSupreme Court of the United States · 1969
- United States v. RainesSupreme Court of the United States · 1960
- Tigner v. TexasSupreme Court of the United States · 1940
- Welch v. HenrySupreme Court of the United States · 1938
- Metropolis Theatre Co. v. City of ChicagoSupreme Court of the United States · 1913
12 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by5 opinions
- In Re Review of Opinion 475 of the Advisory Committee on Professional Ethics & DR 2-102(C)Supreme Court of New Jersey · 1982
- Ricci v. State Board of Law ExaminersDistrict Court, E.D. Pennsylvania · 1977
- Aronson v. AmbroseCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1973
- Ago, Florida Attorney General Reports1974
- In Re Review of Opinion 475 of the Advisory Committee on Professional Ethics & DR 2-102(C)Supreme Court of New Jersey · 1982