In Re Review of Opinion 475 of the Advisory Committee on Professional Ethics & DR 2-102(C)
Supreme Court of New Jersey
1Opinion of the Court
89 N.J. 74 (1982)
444 A.2d 1092
ON PETITION FOR REVIEW OF OPINION 475 OF THE ADVISORY COMMITTEE ON PROFESSIONAL ETHICS AND DR 2-102(C).
The Supreme Court of New Jersey.
Argued October 5, 1981.
Decided April 28, 1982.
Katharine J. Sweeney argued the cause for appellant Jacoby & Meyers (Sweeney, Bozonelis, Staehle & Woodward, attorneys).
Colette A. Coolbaugh, Secretary, argued the cause for respondent Advisory Committee on Professional Ethics (Colette A. Coolbaugh, attorney; Richard J. Engelhardt, Staff Attorney, on the brief).
Arthur Montano argued the cause for intervenor New Jersey State Bar…
Also in this document: Concurring in part, dissenting in part · Handler; Concurring in part, dissenting in part · Handler.
2Cases cited36 opinions
- Buckley v. ValeoSupreme Court of the United States · 1976
- Williamson v. Lee Optical of Oklahoma, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1955
- Central Hudson Gas & Electric Corp. v. Public Service CommissionSupreme Court of the United States · 1980
- Virginia State Board of Pharmacy v. Virginia Citizens Consumer Council, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1976
- Pike v. Bruce Church, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1970
31 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.