Legal Opinion

Haney v. White & Case LLP

District Court, D. South Carolina

Decided July 27, 2021No. 2:19-cv-02098Unknown

1Opinion

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT DISTRICT OF SOUTH CAROLINA CHARLESTON DIVISION Katherine St. John Haney and James Byrnes,) Civil Action No. 2:19-cv-2098-RMG as Personal Representatives of the Estate ) of Muriel T. Farr ) ) Plaintiffs, ) ) v. ) ORDER AND OPINION ) Michael E. Kavoukjian, Esq., ) and White & Case, LLP ) ) Defendants. ) ___________________________________ ) Before the Court is a partial motion for summary judgment and a motion to strike filed by Plaintiffs Katherine St. John Haney and James Byrnes as Personal Representatives of the Estate of Muriel T. Farr (Dkt. Nos. 78, 89),…

2Cases cited39 opinions

  1. Celotex Corp. v. Catrett, Administratrix of the Estate of CatrettSupreme Court of the United States · 1986
  2. George F. Thompson v. Potomac Electric Power CompanyCourt of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · 2002
  3. Feminist Majority Foundation v. Richard HurleyCourt of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · 2018
  4. Phillips v. CSX Transportation, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · 1999
  5. Dean v. Ruscon Corp.Supreme Court of South Carolina · 1996

34 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API