Legal Opinion

Paul Sartin v. McNair Law Firm PA

Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit

Decided June 23, 2014No. 13-1265PublishedCited by 30 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Affirmed by published opinion. Judge NIEMEYER wrote the opinion, in which Judge GREGORY and Judge FLOYD joined.

NIEMEYER, Circuit Judge:

In a complex procedural context, we are called to construe the proper scope of Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 60(a), which authorizes district courts to correct mistakes found in judgments and orders.

Employing that Rule, the South Carolina District Court revisited two sanctions orders it had entered against “the Plaintiffs” in a private civil action more than a year earlier, indicating that it had originally intended the sanctions to apply to the plaintiffs’…

2Cases cited16 opinions

  1. John James Mary James v. Cecil B. Jacobson, Jr., M.D. Reproductive Genetics Center, LimitedCourt of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · 1993
  2. John Garamendi v. Jean-Francois HenninCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2012
  3. Burton v. JohnsonCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 1992
  4. Sebastian Scola v. Boat Frances, R., Inc.Court of Appeals for the First Circuit · 1980
  5. Jennifer N. Kocher Darlene Kocher Carl Kocher v. Dow Chemical Company E.I. Du Pont De Nemours & CompanyCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1997

11 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by30 opinions

  1. Driskell v. Summit Contracting Grp., Inc.District Court, W.D. North Carolina · 2018
  2. Raynor v. G4S Secure Solutions (USA) Inc.District Court, W.D. North Carolina · 2018
  3. Trs. of Bos. Univ. v. Everlight Elecs. Co.District Court, District of Columbia · 2019
  4. Nichole Warner v. Sean WarnerSupreme Court of Vermont · 2025
  5. Brandy Bentley v. Commissioner of SSACourt of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · 2019

25 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API