Legal Opinion
Mobil Alaska Pipeline Company v. United States of America and the Interstate Commerce Commission, and Sohio Pipe Line Company, Amerada Hess Pipeline Corporation, Union Alaska Pipeline Company, Intervening State of Alaska and Arctic Slope Regional Corporation, Intervening Bp Pipelines Inc. v. United States of America and the Interstate Commerce Commission, Exxon Pipeline Company v. United States of America and the Interstate Commerce Commission, and Union Alaska Pipeline Company, Intervening Arco Pipe Line Company v. United States of America and the Interstate Commerce Commission, State of Alaska, Intervening
Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit
Decided July 29, 1977No. 77-2392Published
1Opinion of the Court
557 F.2d 775
MOBIL ALASKA PIPELINE COMPANY, Petitioner,
v.
UNITED STATES of America and the Interstate Commerce
Commission, et al., Respondents,
and
Sohio Pipe Line Company, Amerada Hess Pipeline Corporation,
Union Alaska Pipeline Company, Intervening Petitioners,
State of Alaska and Arctic Slope Regional Corporation,
Intervening Respondents.
BP PIPELINES INC., Petitioner,
v.
UNITED STATES of America and the Interstate Commerce
Commission, Respondents.
EXXON PIPELINE COMPANY, Petitioner,
v.
UNITED STATES of America and the Interstate Commerce
Commission, Respondents,
and
Union Alaska Pipeline Company,…
Also in this document: Per curiam; Dissent.
2Cases cited30 opinions
- Alyeska Pipeline Service Co. v. Wilderness SocietySupreme Court of the United States · 1975
- United States v. Students Challenging Regulatory Agency Procedures (SCRAP)Supreme Court of the United States · 1973
- Bi-Metallic Investment Co. v. State Board of EqualizationSupreme Court of the United States · 1915
- Atchison, Topeka & Santa Fe Railway Co. v. Wichita Board of TradeSupreme Court of the United States · 1973
- Interstate Commerce Commission v. Louisville & Nashville RailroadSupreme Court of the United States · 1913
25 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.