Zebell v. Krall

Plaintiff appeals from judgment of no cause for action entered .after a jury verdict for defendants. Plaintiff ’ contends that the trial court erred in refusing to grant his motion for a new trial because the court erred-in instructing the jury and because the verdict was contrary to the great weight of the evidence.

Plaintiff was injured June 16, 1954, about 6 p.m., when his car collided with the Krall car as defendant Howard Krall was making a left-hand turn to enter a driveway.

Plaintiff, a married man, 44 years of age, resided in Millburg, and was engaged in the business of producing and…