Sheffer v. Fleischer
Michigan Supreme Court
Error to Charlevoix; Mayne, J. Assumpsit by Allen Roswell Sheffer against A. B. Fleischer upon certain promissory notes. A judgment for defendant is reviewed by plaintiff on writ of error.
1Opinion of the CourtHooker, J.
The undisputed evidence shows that six notes, bearing the genuine signatures of the defendant as maker, in suit in this case, came to the hands of the plaintiff as a bona fide purchaser, for value. The defense made is that the notes made were not delivered to the payee or any other persqn. The jury found a verdict for the defendant, and the plaintiff has appealed.
The transaction is in dispute, and, as plaintiff has appealed upon the ground that the circuit judge should have directed a verdict in his favor, we must dispose of *271the question upon that version of the testimony most favorable to…
2Cases cited4 opinions
- Burson v. HuntingtonMichigan Supreme Court · 1870
- Laprad v. SherwoodMichigan Supreme Court · 1890
- Portsmouth Savings Bank v. Village of AshleyMichigan Supreme Court · 1892
- Cressinger v. DessenburgMichigan Supreme Court · 1880
3Cited by4 opinions
- Leonard Refineries, Inc. v. GregoryMichigan Supreme Court · 1940
- Parsons v. HoffmanMichigan Supreme Court · 1958
- C. B. Ensign & Co. v. ForrestMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1925
- Felske v. Detroit United RailwayMichigan Supreme Court · 1912