Consolidated Foods Corporation v. Pearson
Supreme Court of Minnesota
1Opinion of the Court
Sheran, Justice.
Appeal from a judgment of the district court and an order denying a motion for a new trial.
Appellants, A. M. Pearson and his wife, Eva M. Pearson, were the sole owners and principal officers of a now defunct corporation called Sunbreak, Inc., whose business included the marketing of eggs. On December 9,1966, Pearson submitted to respondent a financial statement for Sunbreak on the basis of which respondent authorized a line of credit not to exceed $25,000 in connection with an arrangement whereby Sunbreak placed its produce in cold storage at respondent’s warehouse in St. Paul…
2Cases cited10 opinions
- Davis v. Re-Trac Manufacturing CorporationSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1967
- Spiess v. BrandtSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1950
- Hollerman v. F. H. Peavey & Co.Supreme Court of Minnesota · 1964
- Penn Anthracite Mining Co. v. Clarkson Securities Co.Supreme Court of Minnesota · 1939
- Swedeen v. SwedeenSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1965
5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by4 opinions
- Alta Vista State Bank v. Linda Kobliska, First National Bank of Minneapolis, D/B/A First Bank, MinneapolisCourt of Appeals for the First Circuit · 1990
- Vacinek v. First National Bank of Pine CityCourt of Appeals of Minnesota · 1987
- Community Finance Group, Inc. v. Fields (In Re Fields)United States Bankruptcy Court, D. Minnesota · 2011
- American Federal Bank v. West Central Ag ServicesDistrict Court, D. Minnesota · 2021