Legal Opinion

Dorothy E. Brown and Donald Lee Brown and United States National Bank of Oregon, Etc. v. United States

Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit

Decided May 19, 1970No. 23774_1PublishedCited by 25 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

HUFSTEDLER, Circuit Judge:

The residuary legatees of Clay Brown, deceased, appeal from a judgment of the district court denying their claim to a partial refund of income taxes for 1956. 1 At issue is the tax treatment of two blocks of stock that the decedent acquired pursuant to a stock option plan under the then applicable section 421 of the Internal Revenue Code (26 U.S.C. § 421). 2

On October 28, 1954, Mr. Brown was elected president of M and M Woodworking Company (“M & M”), and shortly thereafter became a director. As a part of the resolution naming him president, Mr. Brown was granted a…

2Cases cited9 opinions

  1. Tucker v. AlexanderSupreme Court of the United States · 1927
  2. Wilson v. CommissionerUnited States Tax Court · 1948
  3. Wilson Bros. & Co. v. Commissioner of Internal RevenueCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1948
  4. Rogers v. CommissionerUnited States Board of Tax Appeals · 1935
  5. Rogers v. HelveringCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1939

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by25 opinions

  1. Cencast Services, L.P. v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 2013
  2. In the Matter of Charles A. Steen, Debtor. Dick Dimond, Trustee v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1975
  3. Bear Valley Mutual Water Company v. R. A. Riddell, District Director of Internal RevenueCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1974
  4. Niagara Mohawk Power Corp. v. United StatesUnited States Court of Claims · 1975
  5. Cencast Services, L.P. v. United StatesUnited States Court of Federal Claims · 2010

20 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API