Bear Valley Mutual Water Company v. R. A. Riddell, District Director of Internal Revenue
Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit
1Opinion of the Court
KOELSCH, Circuit Judge:
The government appeals from the granting of taxpayer’s motion to- amend judgment, Fed.R.Civ.P. 60(b)(6), the effect of which was to increase the amount of taxes which the government must refund beyond the amount already refunded pursuant to the original judgment.1
The background of the present dispute is as follows :
Taxpayer is a nonprofit “mutual” irrigation company which distributes water free to its shareholders, covering the costs of capturing and distributing the *950water by other business operations, and by periodic “shareholder assessments.” The government assessed…
2Cases cited20 opinions
- United States v. Felt & Tarrant Manufacturing Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1931
- Angelus Milling Co. v. CommissionerSupreme Court of the United States · 1945
- Tucker v. AlexanderSupreme Court of the United States · 1927
- United States v. Garbutt Oil Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1938
- United States v. AndrewsSupreme Court of the United States · 1938
15 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by23 opinions
- Dunn & Black, P.S. v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2007
- William W. Boyd and Ruth G. Boyd v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1985
- John M. Quarty, Personal Representative of the Estate of Angele C. Quarty Elizabeth B. Cherne v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1999
- Hosking v. CommissionerUnited States Tax Court · 1974
- Niagara Mohawk Power Corp. v. United StatesUnited States Court of Claims · 1975
18 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.