Regents of University v. Gray
California Supreme Court
APPEALS from orders of the Superior Court of Merced County denying a motion for leave to amend a claim presented upon a mortgage note and denying a motion to compel an administrator to convey lands purchased by the mortgagee. J, R. Webb, Judge. The facts are stated in the opinion of the court.
1Opinion of the CourtHarrison, J.
The above-named decedent borrowed from the Regents of the University of California February 28, 1889, forty-seven thousand dollars, and executed to that body his promissory note therefor and a mortgage upon certain real property to secure its payment. After his death a claim was presented to the administrator of his estate on behalf of the Regents, setting out the promissory note and the amount due thereon, and this claim was allowed by the administrator September 13, 1894, for the sum of fifty-one thousand seven hundred and eighty-nine dollars and seventy-eight cents, and on September 23,…
2Cases cited4 opinions
- Perkins v. OnyettCalifornia Supreme Court · 1890
- In re the Estate of SullenbergerCalifornia Supreme Court · 1887
- Bank of Sonoma County v. CharlesCalifornia Supreme Court · 1890
- Evans v. JohnstonCalifornia Supreme Court · 1896
3Cited by12 opinions
- Flynn v. DriscollIdaho Supreme Court · 1924
- Thompson v. KoellerCalifornia Supreme Court · 1920
- In Re Estate of PeaseCalifornia Supreme Court · 1906
- Raggio v. PalmtagCalifornia Supreme Court · 1909
- Orth v. Superior CourtCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1966
7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.