Legal Opinion
Sanders v. Hunter
New Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division
Decided November 12, 1991PublishedCited by 2 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
ROSEMARY HIGGINS CASS, J.S.C.
In this matter the defendant Commissioner moved to declare the plaintiff Marion Sanders (hereinafter Sanders) ineligible to recover benefits from the Unsatisfied Claim and Judgment Fund (UCJF) pursuant to N.J.S.A. 39:6-78(d), 39:6-85 and 39:6-86.6. Plaintiff opposed said motion. After hearing oral argument, I reserved decision to consider the inter-relationship of the several statutes herein implicated. I now hold that the Commissioner is not entitled to recovery against this complainant under N.J.S.A. 39:6-86.6.
For purposes of this motion, the following facts are…
2Cases cited8 opinions
- Hoffman v. HockSupreme Court of New Jersey · 1952
- Wilson v. Unsatisfied Claim and Judgment Fund Bd.Supreme Court of New Jersey · 1988
- Sotomayor v. VasquezSupreme Court of New Jersey · 1988
- Holmberg v. AtenNew Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · 1961
- Williams v. BD. OF EDUC. OF TP. OF DEPTFORDSupreme Court of New Jersey · 1985
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by2 opinions
- Unsatisfied Claim & Judgment Fund Board v. New Jersey Manufacturers InsuranceSupreme Court of New Jersey · 1994
- UCJF v. NJ Mfrs. Ins. Co.Supreme Court of New Jersey · 1994