Legal Opinion
Sotomayor v. Vasquez
Supreme Court of New Jersey
Decided January 26, 1988PublishedCited by 24 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
The opinion of the Court was delivered by
O’HERN, J.
This is a PIP case. PIP is an acronym for personal injury protection benefits, a form of compulsory auto insurance required by the New Jersey Automobile Reparation Reform Act, L. 1972, c. 70 (“No-Fault” Law), N.J.S.A. 39:6A-4. This case concerns the scope of the coverage afforded under a standard New Jersey automobile policy. We do not intend this opinion, or Wilson v. Unsatisfied Claim & Judgment Fund Bd., 109 N.J. 271 (1988), also decided today, to be a treatise on PIP law. We must of necessity refer to various issues that are peripheral to…
2Cases cited8 opinions
- Amiano v. Ohio Casualty InsuranceSupreme Court of New Jersey · 1981
- Cirelli v. Ohio Casualty Insurance Co.Supreme Court of New Jersey · 1977
- In Re the Schedule of Rates for Barnert Memorial HospitalSupreme Court of New Jersey · 1983
- Wilson v. Unsatisfied Claim and Judgment Fund Bd.Supreme Court of New Jersey · 1988
- Selected Risks Ins. Co. v. Allstate Ins. Co.New Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · 1981
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by24 opinions
- Roig v. KelseySupreme Court of New Jersey · 1994
- Caviglia v. Royal Tours of AmericaSupreme Court of New Jersey · 2004
- Wilson v. Unsatisfied Claim and Judgment Fund Bd.Supreme Court of New Jersey · 1988
- Ross v. Transport of New JerseySupreme Court of New Jersey · 1989
- Darel v. Pennsylvania Mfrs. Ass'n Ins. Co.Supreme Court of New Jersey · 1989
19 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.