Williams v. BD. OF EDUC. OF TP. OF DEPTFORD
Supreme Court of New Jersey
1Per curiam
The judgment is affirmed, substantially for the reasons expressed in the majority opinion of the Appellate Division, reported at 192 N.J.Super. 31 (1983). The dissenting opinion below did not address the Appellate Division majority’s dictum that the Board of Education should be permitted to recoup moneys paid to appellant because of an erroneous interpretation of N.J.S.A. 18A:30-2.1. That issue is therefore not before us, see R. 2:2-1(a)(2), and we express no view on it.
For affirmance — Chief Justice WILENTZ, and Justices CLIFFORD, HANDLER, POLLOCK, O’HERN and GARIBALDI — 6.
For reversal —…
2Cases cited1 opinion
- Williams v. Bd. of Ed. Deptford Tp.New Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · 1983
3Cited by11 opinions
- State v. BurnettNew Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · 1984
- Playmates Toys v. Director of Tax.New Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · 1998
- Outland v. Monmouth-Ocean Educ. Service Com'nNew Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · 1996
- Porter v. Elizabeth Bd. of Educ.New Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · 1995
- City of Union v. VealsNew Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · 1991
6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.