Legal Opinion

In Re InPhonic, Inc.

District Court, District of Columbia

Decided December 18, 2009No. Misc. Action No. 06-0507 (ESH). MDL No. 1792PublishedCited by 18 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

MEMORANDUM OPINION AND ORDER

ELLEN SEGAL HUVELLE, District Judge.

Before the Court is the Motion for Payment of Attorneys’ Fees and Expenses by plaintiffs Edwin Davis, Walter Cover, Jonathan Feldman, Stanley J. Heller, Barbara McGivney, Luis Morales, Joshua Pevnick, Paul Rock, Melinda Roquemore, Shelly Salzman, Ryan Sutherland, Iona Workman, and Hongyi Yu. Having considered plaintiffs’ motion and the opposition filed by defendants Helgeson Enterprises (“Helgeson”), David A. Steinberg, and Brian T. Westrick, the Court will grant the motion in part.

BACKGROUND

In 2006, several of the instant…

2Cases cited22 opinions

  1. Hensley v. EckerhartSupreme Court of the United States · 1983
  2. Chambers v. Nasco, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1991
  3. Alyeska Pipeline Service Co. v. Wilderness SocietySupreme Court of the United States · 1975
  4. Buckhannon Board & Care Home, Inc. v. West Virginia Dept. of Health and Human ResourcesSupreme Court of the United States · 2001
  5. City of Riverside v. RiveraSupreme Court of the United States · 1986

17 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by18 opinions

  1. Driscoll v. George Washington UniversityDistrict Court, District of Columbia · 2014
  2. Tridico v. District of ColumbiaDistrict Court, District of Columbia · 2017
  3. Stein v. American Express Travel Related ServicesDistrict Court, District of Columbia · 2011
  4. Bennett v. DonovanDistrict Court, District of Columbia · 2014
  5. Radtke v. CaschettaDistrict Court, District of Columbia · 2017

13 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API