Legal Opinion
Tridico v. District of Columbia
District Court, District of Columbia
Decided January 30, 2017No. Civil Action No. 13-0937 (ESH)PublishedCited by 18 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
MEMORANDUM OPINION
ELLEN SEGAL HUVELLE, United States District Judge .
Plaintiff Philip Tridico has moved for attorneys fees and costs pursuant to 42 U.S.C. § 2000e-5(k) and 38 U.S.C. § 4323(h)(2), under which the Court has discretion to award reasonable fees to a prevailing-party. (Pl.s Mem. in Supp. of Mot. for Attorneys Fees and Costs [ECF No. 76] at 3 (“Pis. Mot.”).) Defendant, the District of Columbia (the “District”), does not dispute that plaintiff is entitled to fees, but it argues that Tridicos request of $314,734.62 in fees and $2,797.66 in costs is unreasonable and should be denied…
2Cases cited19 opinions
- Hensley v. EckerhartSupreme Court of the United States · 1983
- Laffey v. Northwest Airlines, Inc.Court of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 1984
- Laffey v. Northwest Airlines, Inc.District Court, District of Columbia · 1983
- Save Our Cumberland Mountains, Inc. v. Donald P. Hodel, Secretary of the InteriorCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 1988
- In Re Theodore B. OLSONCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 1989
14 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by18 opinions
- State ex rel. Harris v. RubinoOhio Supreme Court · 2018
- Calypso Asset Mgt., L.L.C. v. 180 Indus., L.L.C.Ohio Court of Appeals · 2021
- Garcia Hernandez v. Chipotle Mexican Grill, Inc.District Court, District of Columbia · 2017
- Horenstein, Nicholson & Blumenthal, L.P.A. v. HilgemanOhio Court of Appeals · 2021
- Robinson v. Dist. of ColumbiaCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 2018
13 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.