G & H Associates v. Ernest W. Hahn, Inc.

OPINION

Respondents were granted summary judgment based on the fact that the statute of repose had barred all of appellants’ claims in a construction defect case. We conclude that the district court properly granted summary judgment as to all of appellants’ causes of action except those for willful misconduct/fraudulent concealment of construction defects and intentional concealment of construction defects.

FACTS

The facts of this case are undisputed. On January 20, 1993, a roof section of a commercial building in Reno, owned by appellants and occupied by Mervyn’s Department Store, collapsed.…