Legal Opinion

Hicks v. Piedmont Cold Storage, Inc.

Supreme Court of South Carolina

Decided April 5, 1999No. 24928PublishedCited by 18 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

FINNEY, Chief Justice:

We granted a writ of certiorari to review the Court of Appeals’ decision in Hicks v. Piedmont Cold Storage, Inc., 324 S.C. 628, 479 S.E.2d 831 (Ct.App.1996). We reverse.

*48The children of the deceased, Joseph Hicks, Sr., brought this workers’ compensation action against employer, Piedmont Cold Storage, seeking death benefits. Hicks was killed while repairing the personal vehicle of the plant manager on a Saturday at Piedmont Cold Storage. The single commissioner, affirmed by the appellate panel of the commission, denied the claim finding that Hicks did not: (1) work…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. Rodney v. Michelin Tire Corp.Supreme Court of South Carolina · 1996
  2. Parsons v. Georgetown SteelSupreme Court of South Carolina · 1995
  3. Fountain v. Hartsville Oil MillSupreme Court of South Carolina · 1945
  4. Hicks v. Piedmont Cold Storage, Inc.Court of Appeals of South Carolina · 1996

3Cited by18 opinions

  1. Liberty Mutual Insurance v. South Carolina Second Injury FundCourt of Appeals of South Carolina · 2005
  2. Broughton v. South of the BorderCourt of Appeals of South Carolina · 1999
  3. Etheredge v. Monsanto Co.Court of Appeals of South Carolina · 2002
  4. Frame v. Resort Services Inc.Court of Appeals of South Carolina · 2004
  5. Hargrove v. Titan Textile Co.Court of Appeals of South Carolina · 2004

13 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API