Fountain v. Hartsville Oil Mill
Supreme Court of South Carolina
1Opinion of the CourtChief Justice Baker
delivered the unanimous Opinion of the Court.
This case has given the Court more than the ordinary concern due in a large measure to our sympathy for the respondent. It comes to us with an affirmance by the learned special Circuit Judge of the award of the Industrial Commission, and involves issues as to the controlling law applicable to the factual situation.
On the afternoon of October 17, 1942, the respondent and his son were employed as laborers by the Superintendent of the respondent Oil Mill, the employment to commence on Monday morning, October 19, and they were instructed to report for…
2Cases cited6 opinions
- Eargle v. South Carolina Electric & Gas Co.Supreme Court of South Carolina · 1944
- Branch v. Pacific MillsSupreme Court of South Carolina · 1944
- Ridout v. Rose's 5-10-25c StoresSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1933
- Ryan v. State Industrial CommissionSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1927
- Burnett v. Palmer-Lipe Paint Co.Supreme Court of North Carolina · 1939
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by9 opinions
- Douglas v. Spartan Mills, Startex DivisionSupreme Court of South Carolina · 1965
- Radcliffe v. Southern Aviation SchoolSupreme Court of South Carolina · 1946
- Broughton v. South of the BorderCourt of Appeals of South Carolina · 1999
- Hicks v. Piedmont Cold Storage, Inc.Supreme Court of South Carolina · 1999
- Hicks v. Piedmont Cold Storage, Inc.Court of Appeals of South Carolina · 1996
4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.